Advertisers Kill Tradition

Posted by Kevin Spidel on Jul 20th, 2009 | Comments

Tonight in a Tweet, I realized how true this statement really is; advertisers who approach the social web as a communication vehicle, kill cultural norms within a given space. Case in point…Twitter. Twitter is not just a vehicle to communicate. It is not a tool. It is a culture.

Here at Activating Word of Mouth we focus on authentic word of mouth. This begins with relationships, not spam. We take the advertising out of marketing. Other marketing firms approach social networks as a new vehicle to get their products/services out in volume. They are about noise. Last night I noticed a new trending topic “Chris Brown.” My first thought was, did I miss the news? Did he do something to Rhianna again? I clicked on the search for “Chris Brown” in Twitter and saw this: (more…)

Respect Culture Within the Social Web

Posted by Kevin Spidel on Jul 16th, 2009 | Comments

In the offline world, respecting cultures is just common sense. Different ethnicities, different geographic locations, heritages, traditions, etc. are all around us.  People come from different backgrounds; in my opinion, cultural diversity is what makes the human race a beautiful thing.

Similarly, the online world is full of different cultures; however most assume online cultures consist of the same  factors that define culture offline. Sure social web users have diverse backgrounds that include religion, traditions, regional understandings, etc., but beyond these distinguishing elements lie cultures of each social network.

What does that mean?

People interact and consume information within a specific social network differently then they would others.  For example, if you are on Twitter and link your Facebook status to your Tweets, do you often get people within Facebook telling you to stop spamming their feed with all your status updates?  They might not even be involved with the same social networks as you and not understand that Twitter is about microblogging short posts.

In the case of Twitter and Facebook, these are two very different worlds. Facebook’s main landing page is a social stream of your network. Where folks can see photos, links, comments, events, etc from friends, family, and colleagues. This tends to be a more intimate interaction as posts are not limited to 140 characters like Twitter.

The point being, if one evolved within a given social network, they understand many social norms within that space that might not carry over to another space. If you tweet a lot, and carry that over to Facebook status updates, some might consider that spam. Or at the very least, see it as a social faux pas with that social space.

Social networks develop social norms within their space; be mindful and respect the given culture within that space.

Many large corporations hire anthropologists to understand the business etiquette of various nations in order to minimize the cultural gap.  Here at Activating Word of Mouth, consider us your cultural consultant to the online world.

There are many spaces that have different cultures. Make sure you don’t take that fact for granted.

On the Social Web, Respect – Not Numbers, Matter

Posted by Kevin Spidel on Jun 17th, 2009 | Comments

By Kevin Spidel

People often look at the number of followers/fans of others’ online networks as a way to evaluate the network’s influence.  In the beginning…numbers mattered on the social web; however, we have evolved and are now entering a social web Renaissance where the number of engaged followers matter.  Engagement is measured by followers’/fans’ responses to your content.

On social network sites such as YouTube and Flickr, where the content is the central piece of the conversation, view counts are still relevant.  Yet, with networks like Facebook and Twitter (the two largest growing networks) the central content focus is the conversation.

So those of you reading this blog who are not already faithful followers of our writings, we will once again reiterate the importance of authentic conversations on the social web.  Since social networks revolve around conversation, authentic engagement is a must! The culture of Twitter and Facebook is very open and welcoming; however, if you begin even the slightest spam, repeating, mass messaging technique versus real engagement, these networks are very unforgiving. Users can block your content with a click of a button; forever shutting you out of their content stream. You have one chance to capture social network users in a positive manner, so make a positive splash on the social web and engage authentically.

How?

Social network users are real people, real potential customers or fans of you. They are online to connect to like minded folks.  Brands do not engage, people do!  Remember that you are an individual who is talking about a brand.  Be human first.

In the latest blog post from Social Media Marketing UK they talk about the social web replacing corporate CRM software because of the authentic real and accessible value of the social web: (link here.)

What impact will this have on you and your company?

If you approach social web engagement as a numbers game, you will fail.  If you approach it as building your name identification and engaging into a larger community, you will win. Don’t focus on the numbers. Why, you ask?  Here is an example of authentic respect on the social web versus quantity of fans.  Let’s take a look at the ever so popular actor Aston Kutcher’s influence on Twitter.

As of 6/16/2009 he has 2,212,447 followers; one of the largest, if not the largest, following on Twitter.  Is that influential? Possibly…but let’s really look at the numbers.

•    In the last 24 hours Ashton had 300 ReTweets (Fans who replicated what he was saying verbatim) – That is approximately .013% of his network.

•    His last TwitPic (photo posted live from his mobile device to Twitter) received 44,235 views. That is approximately 1.9% of his network.

Sure the numbers are there, but is he an influencer to his network?  We argue no.  He is not engaging in even 3% of his network.  The value of having over 2 million followers is diminished if less than 5% of those followers do not actually engage and respond to your content.

From an athlete’s sponsor or a brand associated with a personality do these numbers (eyes) matter as much as the interactions of those who listen, ReTweet and evangelize content from a strong network? No.

Sponsors, brands, and those who want to really impact the social web care about strength in the network. This is something you can’t fake.  You can’t buy billboards and ask folks to “follow you on Twitter” as Ashton did and expect quality network.  You must engage naturally and earn your network’s respect. We are here to help coach you in that process.

Below is an example of a strong network.  Let’s stay within the celeb world since we picked on Ashton’s network and take a look at actress Alyssa Milano.

Alyssa_Milano has 89,225 followers but is an active Twitterer.

•    She has over 350 ReTweets in the last 24 hours that is approximately .39% of her network.

Although she has significantly less followers then Ashton; she has nearly the same return on ReTweets.

Imagine if her numbers were double and she still actively engaged on Twitter in her naturally authentic way.  Her influence level would be double Ashton’s with far less followship.

Let’s take a look at her last twitpics:

•    One received 5,362 views, which is approximately 6% of her network.
•     The other received 4,782 views, which is approximately 5.35% of her network.

The best part about these two photographs is that they were taken by her fans, of her fans, wearing HER jeans in a place she loves to spend time (a baseball park.) She merely ReTweeted what her fans did and earned them nearly 10 thousand in views. This is true engagement!

Photos here: http://twitter.com/Alyssa_Milano/status/2171411248
http://twitter.com/Alyssa_Milano/status/2171383587

What is the difference between these two celebs?  Alyssa is actively engaging in conversations with her fans rather then using Twitter as a megaphone.

On the social web, it is about respect and authenticity of your networks… not numbers.

The Evolution of Data & Marketing

Posted by Kevin Spidel on May 17th, 2009 | Comments

By Kevin Spidel

This weekend we were told RSS feeds are dead and Semantic search engines will kill Google.  Awesome technology… but is it game changing?

Remember the days when market data was just phone lists, snail mail addresses, magazine subscriptions, etc? I have spent 10 years working with voter files and effectively getting campaign messages to voters. Trend data and cross tabs are very similar to traditional direct marketing. This type of information is still extremely important in marketing, but acquiring this information is now more accessible and accurate… or is it?

Semantic data from the social web is data exchanged from user input (conversational, personal, and experiential.) This data can be searched, collected, categorized, and targeted.  This is what Activating WOM is all about.  The trick is in understanding what data is relevant and accurate.

As the web evolves, users range in their evolution– some are quick to jump on the newest technology, some stay tight to their Google Readers or Bookmarks until they start to feel behind the curve. It is important to stay abreast of the new technology while not allowing your focus to shift away from traditional online communication.

In online marketing, culture is king. Not technology. Understanding who, why, and what people do online is critical to authentically engaging and empowering brand advocates.

Here is a reflective exercise:

What are your online morning rituals?  How do you get your information?  How has that changed in the last 6 months?

Here is my order in the morning:

1. Check twitter DM’s and mentions
2. Facebook notifications and inbox
3. SMS and Voicemail
4. Email
5. Top 5 blogs in order: 1 – TechCrunch 2 – NY Times 3 – Drudge Report 4 – Mashable 5 – Digg

6 months ago it was:

1. Facebook notifications and inbox
2. Check twitter DM’s and mentions
3. Google Reader
4. Email
5. Voicemail & SMS

A change in priority and a step away from aggregation may be a sign that RSS dying; however, it is important to understand that I am one of those who moves fast to new technology. We can not discredit that RSS and aggregation tools like Google Reader are still very important information sources for many online consumers.

What are your morning informational rituals?