Our good friends over at Roost posted a powerful video we felt the need to share. This is a video showcasing the powerful impact of social media on the world. This video, posted on Youtube, then onto Facebook, then onto their blog came to me via a retweet, and now has over 12,000 views! The powerful networks and influences on these networks are based on relationships online and offline.
A perfect example of social web word of mouth!

… before it gets better. We are talking about social spam on Twitter. Other social networks suffer from this problem as well, however recent changes to Twitter this last month has made the issue worse. We feel the worst is yet to come.
This last month, Twitter launched its new front page / logon screen. This gave us insight into their revenue model, which includes trending data and analytics. Many companies understand that their brands need to be in this space, but they don’t understand how to use social networks.
The proven models are about volume and numbers, not about engagement or advocacy on the social web. Therefore are many semantic bots that have been created and are now spaming the Twitterverse with hashtags and links. Volume, not authenticity, is the focus.
Businesses understand Pay-Per-Clicks and numbers more than they understand brand equity, authentic fellowship and brand advocates on the social web. We at Activating Word of Mouth use a metric that measures a brand’s Social Web Impact. This measures how influential your following is and how authentic.
The reality is, that brands still focus on volume and not engagement. Thus, new strategies like pay-per-tweet and celebrity endorsements are moving forward. This type of marketing will inevitably trend high on the twitter feeds and consequently land on the front page.
Is this good? (more…)

Tonight in a Tweet, I realized how true this statement really is; advertisers who approach the social web as a communication vehicle, kill cultural norms within a given space. Case in point…Twitter. Twitter is not just a vehicle to communicate. It is not a tool. It is a culture.
Here at Activating Word of Mouth we focus on authentic word of mouth. This begins with relationships, not spam. We take the advertising out of marketing. Other marketing firms approach social networks as a new vehicle to get their products/services out in volume. They are about noise. Last night I noticed a new trending topic “Chris Brown.” My first thought was, did I miss the news? Did he do something to Rhianna again? I clicked on the search for “Chris Brown” in Twitter and saw this: (more…)

Many businesses look to other businesses in their market and/or geographic area for ideas. In social media we find this is a double edged sword. We recently wrote about the Perils and Rewards of Being First in the market. This was in response to many conversations with prospective clients wanting to understand more about social media but not really wanting to make that dive into resourcing out part of their marketing budget toward Word of Mouth marketing on the social web.
We at ActivatingWOM have been traveling a lot. We are still amazed that geographic markets drive the decision to jump into the social web. When we are talking to clients in the Bay area, where social media applications, networks, etc are born every day, the dialogue is about new analytics and how to maximize new networks before the main stream takes advantage of these tools. In LA it is about how to define your social presence as it relates to fans of various talents and how engagement is measured. In DC it is about identifying policy trends in conversations and identify influencers of various policy discussions.
In Arizona, people are will watching and learning. Few companies are willing to jump out of their bubble and take the social media plunge. Even the various markets mentioned above are still in a bubble. They rarely look at how practices in these various markets can help with their web presence.
I come from an extensive political background. I saw the “bubble effect” often. In various campaigns you tend to surround yourself with like minded individuals who further strengthen your ideals but tend to disconnect you with others outside your bubble. I often challenged organizations and candidates to get out of their bubble. Washington tends to be so deep in the beltway bubble that they hire pollsters after pollsters to get the pulse of the American public.
On the social web, everything is available. Case study after case study is available. What relevance does it have to your industry? No one else in your industry is really resourcing out this work you say? It is time to get out of your bubble. In a previous post we demonstrated various companies’ success on the social web.
If you are a company that has never used Twitter or often laugh at discussions around social media, I have a test for you. Go to http://search.twitter.com and type in a few words related to your product and or services. I guarantee you that there are conversations happening around your services and or products. From Tea to Athletes we manage a wide range of clients who at one time thought the social web was not for them. This simple tests showcases that there are potential customers and/or fans out there. If they are already talking about you, why are you not engaging?
It is time to get out of the bubble, and make the jump. Don’t let bubble vision keep you from success.

Lately, I keep coming across services such as PMS Social Suite and Tweeterfollowers, which claim to grow your Twitter network to thousands of followers within 30 days. Who are these followers? Are they spam bots? People who have similar interests as you? Are they even people?
I am from Illinois and lived in Chicago for sometime. The City’s reputation for wind, beautiful lake paths, horrid winters, and corrupt politics are all right on. Growing up I recall hearing jokes and comments about dead people voting in Chicago…as a child I would try to picture a deceased person rising from their resting place and voting, then wondered how a cremated person could vote (yes I was a strange kid). Now I understand that dead people of course did not actually vote but their propensity to vote straight ticket Democrat preceded them into death thanks to Chicago party politics.
What does this diatribe have to do with Twitter and social networks? My anecdote poses a very important question, are these services akin to having dead people following you on Twitter?
There is an internal debate among the social web community regarding numbers v. authenticity, which is more important? Are they mutually exclusive? We argue that when numbers and authenticity coexist a very powerful network is born. For those that are entering the social web world for marketing purposes, we assert that the “magic sauce” exists in the strategy in which you engage your network. Meaning, if you opt to use a follower aggregator service, you must put extra time in auditing your network to ensure that your numbers reflect real authentic followers.
I think of “fake followers” as inflation, just because your numbers are bigger does not mean you can buy more influence as the influence price will also become higher. So 30,000 followers may seem like a lot but really you only have 2,000 engaged followers. Further, when you follow other artificial networks, your perceived influence becomes almost impossible to gauge. At the end of the day if you are using Twitter for marketing purposes, you must be able to measure your influence and potential ROI. Inflationary numbers will distort your true influences, just as it does in the monetary economy.
If you choose to use a service that automize your network growth there are several strategies you can take to also authenticate your network:
Follow these steps and not only will you have a large following but one that is engaged in your topic area. Activating WOM works with clients to develop network engagement strategy and produce marketing analytics to track your network’s influence in terms of sales, brand discussion, and network interaction.
Don’t let your network become dead, white noise…unlike Chicago politics, where a vote is a vote, in the social web world, an authentic follow is much more valuable than fake followers.


You can trend your brand on Twitter fairly easy. But with that comes accountability. Two latest campaigns have showcased this well.
Brands on Twitter follow “hashtags” and topics that are trended in an attempt to be apart of the Tweeting action. Hashtags are # signs combined with terms that denote a conversation. Example, conferences use #BWE09 or #140conf to tag conversations about their conferences. #BWE09 = BlogWorld 2009 in Las Vegas and #140conf = the 140 Conference in New York City.
Hashtags create a vehicle to track and trend conversations about specific subjects. When the Iran Election protest blew up on twitter a hashtag became a trend using #iranelections. Brands use hastags for their own campaigns. Recently two similar companies (one US based the other UK based) have created and trended their own hashtags. One was a big fail in the Twitter universe and the other has hit in the community to the pont that the viral buzz around it has caught the eyes of main stream media.
These two campaigns are focused around website development companies SquareSpace and MoonFruit.
SquareSpace and Moonfruit are “turn key” web development platforms for any type of user who wants to create a web presence. From the pro-webdeveloper to the novice, both these companies offer tools and packages to help build your website.
A few weeks back SquareSpace launched a campaign where they offered 30 new iPhones to 30 twitter users within a one month period. The only catch was that the Twitter user must use the hashtag #squarespace in their tweets. Our good friends over at Mashable wrote about the campaign here: http://mashable.com/2009/06/10/iphone-squarespace/
The issue, as Mashable points out, was the “fine print.”
However, there is one issue with this campaign: they aren’t really giving away a free iPhone. If you visit the site for the promotion, you’ll note that down the page, in light grey text, that the prize is actually a “$199 gift certificate to the Apple store, which may be used toward the purchase of an 8GB iPhone.”
Why is this a big deal? Because the only way to get an iPhone for $199 is if you also sign up for new service with AT&T. Otherwise, your $199 gift card will go towards the purchase of an iPhone at full retail price, which can run as high as $699 for existing AT&T customers, as we reported yesterday.
From Apple’s iPhone page: “For non-qualified customers, including existing AT&T customers who want to upgrade from another phone or replace an iPhone 3G, the price with a new two-year agreement is $499 (8GB), $599 (16GB), or $699 (32GB).”
In other words, if Squarespace were actually giving away iPhones, they’d be laying out a total of at least $15,000 for the 30-day campaign, versus the $6,000 that 30 $200 gift certificates will cost them.
Folks began Tweeting #squarespace left and right. Congrats… it becomes a rapidly growing trending topic for the $6,000 campaign, but it became more. When people started asking about this hashtag they discovered the fine print and began tweeting about borderline false advertising using SquareSpace’s hashtag. Misleading and deceptive accusations were tweeted about the giveaway using the exact same brand vehicle that was associated with SquareSpace’s campaign. All of this twittering began to trigger spam filters on Twitter. So now negative and positive tweets began to spread like wire fire. In the social web, it is very hard to recover, if even possible, to such a negative wild fire. Further, when your brand vehicle, in this case #squarespace, becomes a spam phrase on Twitter, you have just spent $6k to opt out of the fastest growing social network on the web. Wise?
This last week Moonfruit, a competitor, learned from these mistakes and capitalized on the lessons learned by the #squarespace campaign. Mashable compares these two campaigns here: http://mashable.com/2009/07/01/moonfruit-macbook/
Like the Squarespace promo, Moonfruit is offering up free Apple products for tweeting their company name as a hashtag: #moonfruit. Specifically, they’re giving away 10 MacBook Pro computers in 10 days, as a celebration of the company’s 10th anniversary. Each day, a random user who includes the hashtag will win one, and Moonfruit makes a point to eliminate confusion and say “if you win we’ll deliver your new baby to your door!” Winners are announced via the company’s @moontweet account.
Not surprisingly, this promotion is working. #moonfruit is Twitter’s top trending topic today, beating out the likes of Michael Jackson, #iranelection, and Wimbledon-related tweets. The lesson is becoming pretty clear: free stuff works as well on Twitter (and perhaps even better thanks to Trending Topics) as on the rest of the Web.
The difference is, be clear and honest with the campaign. Moonfruit’s $15,000 week long campaign has successfully lead to nearly all positive tweets associated with this brand vehicle. Sure, the campaign is more expensive, but they also are getting great user generated content outside of the Twitter universe.
Here is an example of authentic positive blogging from our friend’s PaigeIam blog:
Twitter is where I saw it first.
Twitter is where I hashtag it.
MOONFRUIT is where I can build beautful simple websites.
MOONFRUIT is where I can win a free MacBook pro.
So Im going to nom away on some #moonfruit and out eat everyone hashtagin’ it on Twitter
As well as 100’s more on the blogosphere: http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?q=moonfruit&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&tab=nb
This is proof that trending campaigns do peculate from Twitter to the entire social web.
The most amazing thing about this is that the trend is about how real and honest the campaign is; most twitteres do not have brand loyalty or even really know about Moonfruit. However, Moonfruit has created marketers who are saying positive things about your it brand by being honest about the campaign specifics. Who knows these people might actually take the time to click on Moonfruit’s website.
Simply put, honesty and integrity results in respect and the ability to create marketers for you on the social web.
This is a word of mouth win.

By Jennifer Kindred
We usually think of “being first” as a good thing…first across the finish line, first in line for the water fountain, first group to come up with the newest innovation. In the business world, unlike the playground, being first accompanies risk. Sure companies are all over the latest innovation once some other hapless company proves the idea is successful or worse a failure. This, unfortunately, seems to be the approach that many companies are taking to the social web. They see the value but are too risk adverse to take a chance on a seemingly untested method.
Kevin came across a fabulous blog by Ken Kendall, which is the inspiration for this blog and can be found at http://www.mpdailyfix.com/2009/06/givetake_ratio.html The truth is that in communications, the risk adverse lose and lose big time. Ken cleverly uses the example of pizzerias in Chicago, basically a dime a dozen right? So why not use the social web to stand out from the noise, which exactly what Ramon De Leon or DPZRamon has done. Ramon is the owner of several Dominoes chains in Chicago and has built an online network about pizza. Ramon is the “pizza guy” and talks about everything pizza. Ken makes an excellent point saying that Ramon was the first pizzeria owner to take advantage of the social web and is known as THE “pizza guy”, as such, it will be much more difficult for other pizza chains to penetrate the Chicago pizza market on the social web.
Being first definitely paid off for Ramon! What about other business titans that were first in communications? Time magazine came out with their 100 Influential People edition a couple of weeks ago, the first profile under “Builders & Titans” was on Biz Stone and Evan Williams…founders of Twitter. The next page profiled Ted Turner, the guy who took a chance on cable television in the 1980’s before most of America even had access to cable TV. The gambles paid off for these folks.
So what does this have to do with activating word of mouth? Everything. I was on Twitter this morning and saw a retweet about a marketing promotion that Orbitz was doing. If you follow Orbitz on Twitter and retweet their message about a free airline ticket, you might win a free plane ticket, I immediately started following Orbitz and retweeted the message, duh I have a lot of traveling to do this year. All Orbitz had to do was give away one plane ticket and thousands of people took notice. This marketing strategy is unique and has not, to my knowledge, been done by an online travel company. Orbitz now has the foundation to build strong online social networks and engage those communities with travel information and additional free giveaways.
For companies who are risk adverse and hesitant to engage the social web, businesses like Orbitz will make it very difficult for you to build online communities once you determine that being left in the communications dust is not good for business. The amazing thing about social web marketing is how little it costs and how much you can gain. At the end of the day, we are all in business to make money…so why wait, be first in your industry to engage on the social web and see how much bang you get for your buck!

By Kevin Spidel
World renowned photographer Jose Villa offered a scholarship to his photography workshops in Tuscany, Italy to the winner of his 12Seconds competition.
12Seconds.TV is one of the most popular video messaging sites on the web and also good friends of the ActivatingWOM team.
The video contest received over 4700 votes. Online word of mouth actions such as ReTweets, submissions, and advertising of each artists’ submission drove new views to Jose’s website and piqued interests of many who had not previously known about his workshops.
Jose also created a twitter account and actively engaged in conversations: http://twitter.com/ItalyWorkshop
The submitted videos demonstrated artistic talents from around the world and exposed artists’ works to the social web. The bonus was that by using 12seconds.tv the contest was interactive with the artist, kept the attention span of new viewers, and was entertaining.
Here are the top picks: http://josevilla.bigfolioblog.com/weblog/post/110789
And the winner:
shiz-what? on 12seconds.tv
By engaging his online audience to produce their own content about his workshops, Jose not only won over new fans, but received more creditable word of mouth advertising than if he had worked through traditional firms, which would have required a large budget for less return.
This is authentic word of mouth marketing on the web. It is a social media win!

By Jennifer Kindred
Tweet, tweeps, tweeter, twead, tweetup…the list goes on. The phenomenon called Twitter has taken on a language and life of its own.
So what is all the Twitter hype really about? Community. The most recent numbers from Nielsen taken in January 2009 indicate that Twitter grew 1,382% year-over-year, registering a total of just more than 7 million unique visitors in the US. Not only is that huge growth in one year, but in one month like in January, Twitter.com clocked 4.5 million unique visitors in the US, meaning the service grew by more than 50 percent month-over-month. 7 million people (just in the US) are using Twitter…who are these people? Its like knowing that there are millions of Brittany Spears fans but yet you have never met one of them.
Twitter is simply a social network where people are allowed to post comments to their “followers” (people in their network). The catch is that the posts can only be 140 characters; given these restraints I have seen some interesting uses of the English language. But what is Twitter really about….just posting random thoughts under 140 characters, surely there is more? I argue that yes, Twitter is much more than random posts. It is where millions of people have gathered to start conversations. What are these conversations about, are they meaningful, or spamiful?
The Harvard Business School recently published a study of 300,000 randomly selected Twitter users during the month of May 2009. Study results showed that the top 10% of Twitter users are responsible for 90% of the tweeting. More numbers…what does this mean, is Twitter just a vehicle for white noise and spam? We at ActivatingWOM argue, NO.
This study actually legitimizes the Web3 semantic marketing approach. The 10% of Twitter users that use their social networks to engage in authentic, meaningful conversation are the most active and will receive the most responses from their networks because they are not spamming their followers. The spamming/dark side of Twitter does not receive real interaction with their networks, the socialites of Twitter will not interact with spambots and therefore, those profiles become idle. It is about influence of these conversations.
So what can Twitter do for you, your brand, your company? Build. Twitter can be a vehicle to build a community of brand advocates for you, a social network of people interested in what you are talking about, producing, or selling. However, in order to build on Twitter you must engage the community in a smart, meaningful and most importantly authentic way. This is word of mouth marketing.
Use Twitter wisely and a whole Community will be there to Build for you!

By Kevin Spidel
A few months ago I was contacted by Ford to create a video of why I should be given one of their new cars to drive for 6 months. At first, I was thinking this was another big company trying to capitalize on social media leaders’ networks. I wrongly opted to skip making the video.
That was dumb.
A few weeks went by and I started noticing all my friends in social media (professional and hobbyists) begin posting their videos for Ford. These are people I trust. I was surprised that they were falling for such a scam. It was me that was being naive.
Nearly all of the top 100 people that Ford awarded cars to I know through the web and my work. I missed out.
Being upset at myself for missing out on the fun (and the free car) I started following this social media campaign closer. Today there was another write up: http://mashable.com/2009/05/18/ford-social-media
This article showcases the best data to date on a successful social media campaign by a large company.
Here is a winning video submission from one of my colleagues / friends.
This video captures true authentic word of mouth marketing, not paid shrills. Participants are enthusiastic about an opportunity to drive a new car and are rewarded for marketing Ford online.
This is a solid example of how and why Ford is winning on the social media game.
